<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

			<rss version="2.0" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">

			<channel>
			<title>TheRealTimeWeb.com - WebRTC</title>
			<link>http://www.therealtimeweb.com/index.cfm</link>
			<description>A technology blog with a special focus on real-time web technologies, web video and the Flash Platform.</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:45:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:32:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>stefan@therealtimeweb.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>stefan@therealtimeweb.com</webMaster>
			<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
			<itunes:category text="Technology" />
			<itunes:category text="Technology">
				<itunes:category text="Podcasting" />
			</itunes:category>
			<itunes:category text="Technology">
				<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
			</itunes:category>
			<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:author></itunes:author>
			<itunes:owner>
				<itunes:email>stefan@therealtimeweb.com</itunes:email>
				<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			</itunes:owner>
			
			<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
			
			<item>
				<title>Microsoft Shares Its Vision For Real Time Communication On The Web</title>
				<link>http://www.therealtimeweb.com/index.cfm/2012/8/6/skype-webrtc</link>
				<description>
				
				Admittedly I may be promising too much with that title: Microsoft isn&apos;t exactly sharing its plans in detail but they certainly are making it clear that their vision differs slightly from that of Google and other browser vendors when they recently published a post titled &apos;Customizable, Ubiquitous Real Time Communication over the Web (CU-RTC-Web)&apos; on the official &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/08/customizable_ubiquitous_real_t.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Skype blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;p&gt;
So what did they announce? In the post several key Skype/Microsoft engineers (headed by Matthew Kaufman who many Flash developers will remember as the inventor of RTMFP) explain Microsoft&apos;s contribution of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5labs.com/cu-rtc-web/cu-rtc-web.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CU-RTC-Web proposal&lt;/a&gt; to the W3C WebRTC working group.&lt;p&gt;
So why is Microsoft submitting their own RTC proposal to the working group? In short Microsoft thinks that the existing proposal falls short in several areas. According to Microsoft it doesn&apos;t address interoperability between different types of clients (not just web browsers) very well (&quot;instead focuses on video communication between web browsers under ideal conditions&quot;) and also needs more flexibility when it comes to media formats and codecs.&lt;br&gt;Microsoft also point out that the existing proposal takes a significant dependency on the legacy of SIP technology, which is a suboptimal choice for use in Web APIs in their opinion. This in turn increases complexity and limits flexibility.&lt;p&gt;
You can dig deeper into the specifics of Microsoft&apos;s proposal on their &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/08/customizable_ubiquitous_real_t.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;p&gt;
From the perspective of a Flash developer who has been working with real-time technologies for years on the Flash platform this is an interesting topic. It is clear that one of the biggest hurdles in the quick iteration and roll-out of new plugin-free, open standard technologies is just that: the fact that they are open and standardised. Whilst it would be great for developers to have access to APIs that are truly cross-platform, cross-browser and cross-device I do ask myself how realistic it is to expect this anytime soon (trust me, I&apos;d be one of the first to have a use case for properly integration Skype calls as part of a web application).
&lt;p&gt;Yet here we are seeing major players (namely Google and Microsoft) with their specific visions of how such a technology should work, and Microsoft holding back support in its browser until a standard has been formalised whilst Google and others add support for a whole host of new web technologies and APIs whilst they are still being worked on.&lt;p&gt;
I&apos;m not going to criticise either approach as both have their good sides, but it demonstrates that a lot of people will have to do a lot of talking before we see a real standard emerging. On the other hand maybe we all need to be less concerned about standardisation, but instead simply work towards a good standard, and most importantly work together to get there.
				</description>
				
				<category>Google</category>
				
				<category>WebRTC</category>
				
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:32:00 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.therealtimeweb.com/index.cfm/2012/8/6/skype-webrtc</guid>
				
				
			</item>
			</channel></rss>